087 822 1639
Skip to content 087 822 1639
An international divorce involving South Africa may require separate South African legal advice even when the divorce itself is taking place in another country, particularly where South African jurisdiction, an antenuptial contract, property, businesses, trusts, pensions, children or implementation of a foreign order is involved.
A divorce can be conducted in London, Sydney, Toronto, Dubai, New York or another jurisdiction while important parts of the legal and financial picture remain in South Africa.
The overseas lawyer may therefore need reliable South African legal information before advising on the foreign proceedings or finalising a settlement.
The important question is not whether every international divorce needs two legal teams. Many do not.
The question is whether the particular matter contains a South African issue that the foreign lawyer cannot safely resolve by applying their own domestic law alone.
This guide explains when South African legal advice may be required, what the South African lawyer’s role can be, and how the two legal teams can work together without unnecessarily duplicating work.
| Question | General position |
My divorce is overseas. Can South African law still matter? | Yes. South African jurisdiction, matrimonial-property issues, assets, ANCs, pensions, companies, trusts, children and implementation can remain relevant. |
Does having South African assets mean I must divorce in South Africa? | No. Divorce jurisdiction and the location of assets are separate questions. |
Can my foreign lawyer advise on the meaning of my South African ANC? | The foreign lawyer can advise on its treatment under their law, but South African advice may first be needed to establish its South African meaning and effect. |
Does a foreign divorce automatically transfer South African property? | No. South African legal, conveyancing, corporate or other implementation requirements may still apply. |
Can MVA take over my overseas divorce? | Not necessarily, and that is often not required. The foreign lawyer can remain responsible for the foreign proceedings while MVA advises on the South African component. |
When should South African advice be obtained? | Ideally before proceedings or settlement terms are finalised where a material South African issue exists. |
There is no single test.
The need usually arises because one part of the marriage, financial structure or family remains connected to South Africa.
Common examples include:
The foreign lawyer does not necessarily need to become an expert in South African law.
The more efficient approach can be to identify the South African question precisely and obtain focused South African advice on that issue.
The fact that one spouse now lives abroad does not necessarily mean that South African divorce jurisdiction has disappeared.
Section 2 of the Divorce Act provides jurisdiction where either spouse is domiciled within the relevant court’s jurisdiction when the action is instituted, or satisfies the statutory ordinary-residence route.
That does not mean that South Africa is necessarily the appropriate place for every internationally connected divorce.
It means that jurisdiction should be established rather than assumed where there is a genuine question about whether proceedings could take place in South Africa.
For the detailed jurisdiction and domicile analysis, see South African Divorce for South Africans Living Abroad.
This article deliberately does not repeat that analysis.
A South African antenuptial contract does not cease to exist merely because the spouses move to another country.
But three separate questions should be distinguished.
First, what does the ANC mean under South African law?
Second, which law governs the proprietary consequences of the marriage?
Third, if the divorce takes place overseas, what effect does the foreign court give the ANC or the resulting South African matrimonial-property position?
Those questions are not interchangeable.
The applicable-law position in South Africa changed materially in N.P. v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development [2026] ZAWCHC 343.
The Western Cape High Court replaced the former husband-domicile rule with a gender-neutral hierarchy beginning with a sufficiently connected choice of law and then, in the absence of an effective choice, considering common domicile, common habitual residence, common nationality and finally the spouses’ closest joint connection at the time of marriage.
The order contains transitional provisions affecting existing marriages, including marriages in which the spouses selected a governing law in an antenuptial contract. The applicable position should therefore be checked against the terms of the ANC, the date of the marriage and the transitional provisions in the order.
A foreign lawyer dealing with a South African ANC may therefore need a focused South African opinion before deciding how that agreement should be treated in the foreign proceedings.
A foreign divorce settlement can take South African property into account without the foreign court’s order automatically completing the South African transfer.
For example, a settlement may require:
The legal teams should establish whether the proposed transaction can actually be implemented in South Africa.
Questions may involve:
This work should ideally occur before the foreign settlement becomes final.
A commercially attractive agreement can become difficult to implement if the parties only investigate the South African mechanics afterwards.
A common mistake in international divorce is to describe a South African company as though everything owned by the company belongs personally to the shareholder spouse.
That is generally incorrect.
The company and shareholder are legally distinct.
The spouse’s economic interests may instead include:
A company valued at R50 million also does not necessarily mean that a spouse holding 30% of its shares owns an immediately realisable asset worth R15 million.
Control, minority status, transfer restrictions, debt, liquidity, shareholder agreements and the valuation methodology can all matter.
Where an overseas financial settlement relies on a South African business to produce cash, the difference between value and liquidity is particularly important.
For England and Wales matters, see South African Assets in an English Divorce for the fuller treatment of these issues.
A shareholder loan can represent an economic interest separate from the shareholding itself.
A spouse may own shares in a South African company while the company separately owes that spouse money.
The reverse may also be true.
The existence of a loan balance should therefore be identified and reconciled with the valuation of the business.
It should not simply be ignored or added to the share value without checking whether that would result in double counting.
A recorded loan balance also does not necessarily mean that the entire amount can immediately be withdrawn from the business.
Repayment terms, company liquidity, security, subordination and financing arrangements may affect its practical value.
An overseas lawyer should not assume that assets in a South African trust automatically belong personally to the spouse associated with that trust.
Relevant questions can include:
The purpose of South African advice is to establish the actual legal position.
The foreign lawyer can then determine the significance of those facts under the law governing the overseas financial proceedings.
Complexity alone should not be treated as proof that assets have been concealed.
South African divorce law contains specific statutory rules concerning qualifying pension interests.
A foreign financial order should therefore not assume that an overseas pension-sharing mechanism can simply be imposed on a South African fund.
The relevant questions may include:
The foreign lawyer remains responsible for advising on the pension treatment under the foreign legal system.
South African advice addresses the South African fund and legal mechanism.
A divorce granted overseas may be recognised in South Africa where the requirements of section 13 of the Divorce Act are satisfied.
The statutory test includes specified connections between either spouse and the country in which the foreign order was granted.
But recognition of the parties’ status as divorced should not be confused with every consequence of the foreign order automatically operating in South Africa.
Separate issues can arise concerning:
The correct South African process depends on what the client is actually trying to achieve.
The divorce court and the court dealing with children are not necessarily answering the same jurisdictional question.
International relocation, parental responsibilities and rights, guardianship, habitual residence and wrongful removal or retention can require separate analysis.
Under section 18 of the Children’s Act, guardianship includes giving or refusing consent required by law for a child’s departure or removal from South Africa.
Where a child has already been removed from or retained outside the child’s country of habitual residence, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction may also become relevant.
These matters should not be treated simply as another financial term in a divorce settlement.
A well-managed international matter should avoid having two firms perform the same task.
A practical division can look like this.
The lawyer authorised in the country where the principal proceedings take place ordinarily deals with:
Where required, the South African lawyer may deal with:
Some issues require both teams.
A foreign lawyer may need the South African meaning of an ANC before advising on how the foreign court will treat it.
A foreign settlement may need to be tested against South African conveyancing requirements.
A business valuer may require South African company records.
A pension provision may need to be checked with the South African fund before the foreign settlement wording is finalised.
The objective is not two parallel divorce cases.
It is one coordinated matter with clear responsibility for each jurisdiction.
Timing can materially affect the usefulness of the advice.
South African input should ideally be considered before:
A South African lawyer brought in after the foreign order has been granted may still be able to assist.
But the available options may be narrower if the settlement was drafted without considering the South African legal position.
The documents depend on the issue, but useful material can include:
The purpose is not to collect every document associated with the family.
The South African issue should first be identified, after which the evidence can be gathered proportionately.
Assume a South African couple has lived overseas for twelve years.
Their divorce is proceeding in the country where they now live.
One spouse owns shares in a South African company. The company separately owes that spouse money on shareholder loan. The couple also owns South African property and signed a South African ANC before marriage.
The overseas lawyer remains responsible for the divorce and the foreign financial-remedy law.
South African advice may nevertheless be needed to establish:
That information can then be incorporated into the overseas lawyer’s advice and settlement strategy.
The client has not changed legal teams.
The foreign and South African lawyers are addressing different parts of the same problem.
Martin Vermaak Attorneys Inc. advises on the South African-law component of international divorce and family-law matters.
Depending on the circumstances, this may include:
Where another country’s law is involved, the practitioner authorised in that jurisdiction should advise on that country’s law and court proceedings.
Not always.
South African advice becomes particularly relevant where a material legal, financial or children-related issue remains connected to South Africa.
The overseas lawyer can advise on how their court treats the assets.
Separate South African input may be required to establish legal ownership, local restrictions, value, evidence and implementation.
No.
The location of property does not by itself establish South African divorce jurisdiction. South African jurisdiction is determined under the applicable jurisdictional rules.
Potentially.
Its South African legal meaning should be established separately from the question of what effect the foreign court gives it.
Do not assume so.
The foreign order and the South African legal steps needed to alter registered ownership are separate questions.
Yes.
Where appropriate, MVA can advise on the South African-law component while the foreign lawyer remains responsible for the foreign proceedings.
That should be investigated before proceedings are instituted where possible. For cases involving South Africa and England, see Divorce Jurisdiction: South Africa or England?
South African Divorce for South Africans Living Abroad
For the full South African jurisdiction, domicile, recognition and expatriate-divorce framework.
South Africa–England Divorce & Family Law
For matters specifically connecting South Africa with England and Wales.
South African Assets in an English Divorce
For detailed treatment of South African property, businesses, shareholder loans, trusts, investments and pensions in an English divorce.
Divorce Jurisdiction: South Africa or England?
For cases in which both South Africa and England may genuinely be available forums.
An international divorce does not automatically require two sets of lawyers.
But where an overseas divorce contains a material South African element, separate South African advice can prevent assumptions about jurisdiction, ANCs, ownership, businesses, trusts, pensions, children or implementation from becoming problems later.
The most efficient approach is usually to define the South African issue precisely, allocate responsibility between the legal teams and obtain the necessary local advice before the foreign settlement or court order is finalised.
For clients whose divorce is already being handled overseas, Martin Vermaak Attorneys can work alongside the existing legal team and advise on the South African-law component.
If your divorce is taking place overseas but involves South African law, assets or family issues, a Strategy Session can be used to identify what requires South African advice and what should remain with your foreign lawyer.
Author: Martin Vermaak, B.Proc, LLB
Attorney of the High Court of South Africa | Director, Martin Vermaak Attorneys Inc. | Over 20 years’ experience in divorce and family law
Legal review: 20 September 2026
This information has been prepared for general educational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, financial, tax or other professional advice. South African family law is fact-specific, and the applicable legal position may depend on the circumstances of the individual matter.
Readers should obtain independent professional advice appropriate to their circumstances before making legal, financial or other decisions.
Martin Vermaak Attorneys Inc. is a South African law firm and advises on South African law. Where a matter requires advice or representation concerning the law of another country, advice should be obtained from a practitioner appropriately authorised in that jurisdiction.
Copyright © 2026 Martin Vermaak Attorneys. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use Privacy Policy
BannerText_Seraphinite Accelerator